Revista Académica Divulgativa Arjé
ISSN: 2215-5538 Enero a Julio, 2022 Volumen 5, Número 1
Editorial
5
When education is the practice of freedom, students are not the only ones
who are asked to share, to confess. Engaged pedagogy does not seek
simply to empower students. Any classroom that employs a holistic model
of learning will also be a place where teachers grow and are empowered
by the process (Hooks, 1994, p. 21).
In other words, the educator is not only the one who educates, but the one who,
educating, is educated in dialogue with the learner. Although as teachers we are
the ones who design the lesson plan, we must be humble and learn from the
diversity of backgrounds and differences in points of view. In that context of
humility, we must recognize that we do not have all the answers and that it is in
the relationship between students and facilitators that we learn together.
This idea of pedagogical mediation contrasts with the traditional academic
culture in which objective facts are considered pure, while subjective facts are
viewed with suspicion and received as unreliable. The use of the first person in
pedagogical mediation is seen as a bias, a danger that weakens academic
certainty and must be overcome. In our investigations we are forced to write in
the third person, we are forced to separate ourselves from what we are
passionate about and not to appropriate our thoughts or not take responsibility
for them, which is considered a virtue.
Contrary to what happens widely in traditional academic culture, this more
relational approach to pedagogical mediation places great importance on the
aspect of self-knowledge. In this paradigm, teacher and apprentice are
simultaneously "I" and "you"; their subjective experiences are located on each