1
Proyecto
Transformative research and capacity building in the education
sector to protect livelihoods and biodiversity in Costa Rica
Investigación transformadora y desarrollo de capacidades en el sector
educativo para proteger los medios de subsistencia y la biodiversidad en
Costa Rica
Pesquisa transformadora e desenvolvimento de capacidade no setor
educacional para proteger os meios de subsistência e a biodiversidade na
Costa Rica
Philipp Gorris
Universidad de Osnabrück, Alemania
philipp.gorris@uos.de
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-9495
Dennis Wilke
Universidad de Osnabrück, Alemania
dennis.wilke@uos.de
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-251X
Johannes Halbe
Universidad de Osnabrück, Alemania
johannes.halbe@uos.de
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-4211
Abstract
Osnabrück University and Universidad Técnica Nacional develop inter- and
transdisciplinary approaches in research and education to restore and protect
biodiversity. In Costa Rica, many persistent social-ecological conflicts can be
observed. The case of the Gulf of Nicoya offers a suitable testing ground for
the approaches developed as part of this partnership. This article introduces
2
the project’s focus on the relationship between cultural, economic and political
aspects related to conservation, sustainable land use and community
development. Currently, the project conducts research on social-ecological
conflicts in the Costa Rican pineapple production and its impacts on biological
diversity across the land-sea interface. The inter- and transdisciplinary project
approach to research and education generates tangible knowledge among
researchers, students, and non-scientific local actors.
Keywords: Biodiversity Conservation, Research, Education, Socio-ecological
Conflicts, Sustainability.
Resumen
La Universidad de Osnabrück y la Universidad cnica Nacional desarrollan
enfoques inter y transdisciplinarios en investigación y educación para
restaurar y proteger la biodiversidad. En Costa Rica se observan numerosos
conflictos socioecológicos persistentes. El caso del Golfo de Nicoya ofrece un
campo de pruebas adecuado para los enfoques desarrollados en el marco de
esta asociación. Este artículo presenta el enfoque del proyecto sobre la
relación entre los aspectos culturales, económicos y políticos relacionados con
la conservación, el uso sostenible de la tierra y el desarrollo comunitario. En
la actualidad, el proyecto investiga los conflictos socioecológicos en la
producción de piña en Costa Rica y su impacto en la diversidad biológica en la
interfaz tierra-mar. El enfoque inter y transdisciplinario del proyecto en
materia de investigación y educación genera conocimientos tangibles entre
investigadores, estudiantes y actores locales no científicos.
Palabras claves: Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Investigación, Educación,
Conflictos Socioecológicos, Sostenibilidad.
Resumo
A Universidade de Osnabrück e a Universidade Técnica Nacional desenvolvem
abordagens inter e transdisciplinares na investigação e educação para
restaurar e proteger a biodiversidade. Na Costa Rica, podem observar-se
muitos conflitos socio-ecológicos persistentes. O caso do Golfo de Nicoya
oferece um campo de ensaio adequado para as abordagens desenvolvidas no
âmbito desta parceria. Este artigo apresenta o enfoque do projeto na relação
3
entre aspectos culturais, económicos e políticos relacionados com a
conservação, a utilização sustentável da terra e o desenvolvimento
comunitário. Atualmente, o projeto realiza investigação sobre conflitos
socioecológicos na produção de ananás da Costa Rica e os seus impactos na
diversidade biológica na interface terra-mar. A abordagem inter e
transdisciplinar do projeto à investigação e à educação gera conhecimentos
tangíveis entre investigadores, estudantes e actores locais não científicos.
Palavras-chave: Conservação da Biodiversidade, Investigação, Educação,
Conflitos Socio-ecológicos, Sustentabilidade.
Background
The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES,
2019) calls out for transformative changes to halt the steady decline in
biodiversity and ecosystem services. The Costa Rican-German project
“Transformative research and capacity building to protect livelihoods and
biodiversity in Costa Rica” (CRLiveDiverse) develops inter- and
transdisciplinary approaches in research and education to involve stakeholders
in the generation of holistic knowledge and the implementation of actions to
restore and protect biodiversity in Costa Rica.
Costa Rica is known as a biodiversity hotspot and, in contrast to other
countries in the region, has invested heavily in environmental protection over
the past two decades. In 2019, the Central American nation received the
Champions of the Earth award, the UN’s highest environmental honour, for its
role in the protection of nature and its commitment to ambitious policies to
combat climate change. Thus, Costa Rica is internationally recognized as a
world leader in sustainability placing environmental concerns at the core of its
policies. However, the country is struggling with a series of persistent social-
ecological conflicts that are difficult to resolve (Estado de la Nación 2019).
These conflicts are characterized mainly by competition between various
sectors that together guarantee the country's economic prosperity as well as
by trade-offs between biodiversity protection and economic development,
increasingly to the detriment of the former.
The International Convention on Biological Diversity highlights the challenge
of developing viable strategies for biodiversity protection (UN, 1992; CBC,
4
2000). This challenge particularly includes the integration of local knowledge
in research, public awareness raising and the involvement of stakeholders in
decision-making. The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem
services further stresses that transformative changes are required to halt the
steady decline in biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES, 2019). Inter-
and transdisciplinary research can play a key role here to involve stakeholders
in the generation of holistic knowledge and implementation of actions to
preserve biological diversity whilst sustaining local livelihoods.
A German-Costa Rican Cooperation in Research and Education
CRLiveDiverse is jointly carried out by the Osnabrück University (UOS) in
Germany and Universidad Técnica Nacional (UTN) in Costa Rica.
UTN strives towards having a transformative impact through the development
of business models in sustainable agriculture and aquaculture and their
transfer into practice. This involves offering educational programs to develop
leadership skills in students. At UTN, the Center Sustainable Development
Studies (CEDS) was recently established. It is conceived as an academic body
of the highest level, whose main function is to provide scientific and
technological criteria to contribute to the reduction of the asymmetries
presented by the current development model and its impact on the
environment and society. The concepts of sustainable development and
fundamental human needs as well as the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) serve as a frame of reference. With its actions, it seeks to strengthen
research, transfer, implementation of education and training programs,
informative modules, publications, sale of services as well as to serve as an
institutional platform for the implementation of academic activities related to
sustainable development, which implies ecological balance and economic and
human development in an integral manner.
At UOS, the Institute of Environmental Systems Research (IUSF) is a multi-
departmental institution comprising members from Mathematics, Economics,
Geography, Computer Science, Biology, Cultural Studies and Geosciences.
Changes in environmental systems, problems ensuing from these changes and
their solutions are the focus of the institute’s activities. IUSF understands
environmental systems as dynamic interplay between nature and society. The
institute develops the knowledge base for understanding, assessing and
transforming concrete systems. A variety of methods is used in an integrated
5
manner, and developed further. A specific current focus is on human-
environmental problems linked to biodiversity protection, often with a focus
on water, energy and food systems, using systems science methods in order
to find integrated and locally-adapted solution strategies (e.g., Pahl-Wostl,
2015; Gorris, 2019; Halbe and Adamowski, 2019). Moreover, research
addresses human-environment interactions through narrative analysis (e.g.,
Schlünder, 2018, Koch et al., 2021). In all its work, IUSF strives to combine
disciplinary depth with a holistic understanding of environmental systems, also
at the level of young scientists, and thus to contribute effectively in
interdisciplinary teams to solving important social and ecological challenges.
This partnership creates strong synergies.
UTN has extensive experience in supporting the development of practical
sustainability innovations and facilitation of leadership, while UOS has a long
tradition in systems science and inter- and transdisciplinary cooperation.
Through the exchange on sustainability innovation and leadership skills, this
partnership promotes transformational change in Costa Rica in terms of the
protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services. This collaboration also
supports education in these areas at both universities by allowing students
and researchers to gain experience in and a good understanding of the
linkages between biodiversity and development issues through first-hand
experience in research and teaching. Through the exchange on sustainability
innovation and leadership skills, this partnership contributes to accelerate
transformational change in Costa Rica as well as in Germany in terms of the
protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
The Gulf of Nicoya: An example for the challenge to reconcile
biodiversity conservation objectives and sustaining local livelihoods
based on natural resources
Costa Rica has invested heavily in environmental protection and is a
forerunner in Central America. However, what is perceived as trade-offs
between the SDGs, particularly SDG1 ‘End Poverty’ and SDG 15 ‘Life on Land,
underline the paramount challenges to navigating between socio-economic
development and biodiversity protection. The case of the Gulf of Nicoya offers
a suitable testing ground for the approaches developed as part of this
partnership.
6
The Gulf of Nicoya on the west coast of Costa Rica, one of the most productive
tropical estuaries in the world, is a paradigmatic example of such a social-
ecological conflict and associated trade-offs. The Gulf is Costa Rica's main
fishing area for artisanal fishing and highly attractive for tourism due to its
high level of biodiversity (Herrera Ulloa et al., 2011). However, declining
tourist numbers in recent decades have forced local communities to find
alternative sources of income in the fishing and agriculture sectors, often with
adverse effects on biodiversity. The depletion of fish stocks has forced
authorities to implement a strict fishing moratorium to protect aquatic
biodiversity, which has however further constrained the livelihood
opportunities of local communities. Thus, innovative strategies and measures
are needed to achieve poverty reduction (SDG 1) and protection of maritime
and terrestrial biodiversity (SDGs 14 and 15). The worldwide plunge in foreign
direct investments by 40 percent due to the Corona pandemic (UN, 2020)
intensified social-ecological conflicts, due to the reliance of the country’s
tourism and food processing industries on these funds.
Overfishing and continued illegal fishing have had a negative impact on the
marine ecosystem in the Gulf of Nicoya (Láscarez 2012; Palacios & Villalobos
2007), which is relevant for over 15,000 fishers. Mangroves in the gulf host
high levels of biodiversity and are under stress, while they form economically
and environmentally important ecosystems as they are essential for the
breeding of long-lived high-trophic-level fish whose nuisance can lead to a
significant loss in fish stocks (Alms & Wolff 2019). The main tributary to the
gulf, the Tempisque River, is called “a slowly dying giant”. It is not only the
main tributary to the gulf but also the main source of water for Costa Rica’s
most important intensively farmed province, Guanacaste. This province has
the largest sized farms in the country, 82% of which are applying fertilizers
and 90% using pesticides. Agricultural pollution and water consumption have
a significant impact on freshwater systems which in consequence also leads
to pollution of the maritime ecosystem in the gulf. Approximately 24,000
hectares of sugar cane (55% of Costa Rica’s output), 5,300 hectares of melon,
and 25% of the country’s rice production depend on the river (FAO 2019).
With around half of its water resources allocated to sugar cane plantations,
90% of Tempisque’s water is allocated to agriculture. Additionally, there is
illegal pumping, sewage pollution, pesticides and deforestation affecting this
and other tributary rivers to the Gulf. At the same time subsistence farming is
7
important to the livelihoods of many in the region and should receive more
attention. As a consequence of climate change, droughts are increasing, which
further exacerbates the problems that these farmers are facing: Due to the El
Niño phenomenon, Costa Rica experienced the most severe drought in 75
years between 2014 and 2016. Tourism serves as another source of income
in Costa Rica and has an ambiguous effect on the environment. On the one
hand, together with altering land-use patterns, it acts as a driver of excessive
water consumption and pollution. On the other hand, ecotourism tends to have
a positive effect on livelihoods and the protection of the environment. There
is a common understanding among international donors, development
agencies and the Costa Rican public that alternative employment strategies
and further sources of income are needed. Accordingly, new jobs and services
are seen as key to successful conservation efforts in the Gulfs region.
An underlying cause for persistent social-ecological conflicts is the lack of
participation in environmental management (Calvo 2018). Therefore, an
interdisciplinary systemic perspective is to be taken and work is to be carried
out on an interdisciplinary basis using various empirical research methods and
participatory processes that bring together different stakeholders to establish
efficient management structures for these complex social-ecological networks
(e.g., Pahl-Wostl, 2015; Heimann, 2018, Kluger et al. 2020). Various studies
have shown the importance of cultural factors on participatory processes in
environmental conflicts (e.g., Schilling-Vacaflor & Vollrath, 2012). To be able
to fully explore the specific social and cultural factors underlying social-
ecological conflicts, joint contributions from natural sciences, political sciences
and humanities are necessary. Research topics include, for example, how
municipalities work together; how the inter-sectoral and inter-municipal
cooperation of relevant actors (e.g. from the food, energy and water sectors)
can be promoted through inclusive management processes; the importance
of discourses, narratives and culturally determined attitudes and behaviours
in the population when it comes to solving environmental and resource
problems locally; what opportunities are offered by technological innovation
and transformation; what are relevant actors for environmental governance;
and which strategies are suitable for establishing cooperative management
structures and facilitating exchange in (new) stakeholder networks. Especially
with regard to the interdependencies of food, water, employment and their
vast implications for environmental quality, a nexus-perspective should be
applied (Pahl-Wostl et al. 2021). In particular, the governance dimension of
8
this nexus-perspective should be considered to address the complexity of
human-environment relationships, which again can be guided by the Narrative
Policy Framework (e.g., Ingram et al., 2019) that includes the impacts of
power-related, economical and socio-cultural narratives.
Importantly, our transdisciplinary approach actively involves stakeholders in
research, links research to local processes of (social and technological)
innovation by carrying out transformative research and empowers students
and lecturers on both the Costa Rican and German side to become change
agents” or “transition intermediaries”. This is supported through the
partnership by helping participants to develop entrepreneurial skills, learn
about managing transitions and explore new business models based on state-
of-the-art science and local practices. Moreover, linking up with local initiatives
will help in building transformative networks between science and society.
Inter- and transdisciplinary education in practice
Several activities are realized to promote inter- and transdisciplinary
education. These include, for instance, exchanges between students, the
creation and implementation of joint learning modules with interdisciplinary
focusses, and summer schools in both countries. For instance, a 12-day-long
summer school on ‘livelihoods and biodiversity in Costa Rica’ was organized
by the project in Atenas. The participants were students of Bachelor and
Master programs at UOS and UTN. The students learned about the
interrelationship of cultural, economic and political aspects related to
conservation, sustainable land use, community development and livelihood
protection in class room sessions and field trips. The program consisted of
introductory talks and exercises complemented by student projects in small
groups on the interplay between livelihoods, land use and aquatic as well as
terrestrial biodiversity. Moreover, inter- and transdisciplinary methods for
research were taught focusing on participatory methods that allow for
stakeholder engagement and integrated analysis of social-ecological
problems. These methods included, for instance, participatory modelling using
causal loop diagrams and fuzzy cognitive mapping. The field trips provided
students with insights into the potential and challenges for joint
implementation of biodiversity conservation and transformative change
towards more sustainable livelihoods in order to support experience-based
learning and allow for in-depth reflection on solution strategies.
9
The following reports some selected insights from the educational field trips
during the summer school. Tourism is one of the sectors that generates the
highest annual revenue for the country, but at the same time, it has suffered
a great tendency to industrialization, which implies the implementation of
large international hotel chains, and leave aside sustainable practices in favour
of economic gains. This industrialization of tourism may negatively affect rural
tourism in Costa Rica, for instance due to the fact that small tourist centers
see their annual rate of visitors reduced. Therefore, solutions to address this
problem by promoting more environmentally-friendly tourism are needed to
transform current practices towards more sustainable pathways. Semi-
structured interviews were carried out by the students to explore aspects that
facilitate and obstruct local small-scale businesses’ engagement in sustainable
tourism and obtain concrete business ideas.
One group focused on Costa de Pájaros, a coastal community bordering the
Gulf of Nicoya. The interviews revealed the importance of working together in
the community and setting up external business networks to attract customers
and exchange experiences. Moreover, the interviews with local entrepreneurs
showed the students an impressive engagement. Students gained first-hand
insights into the local sustainable agroforestry system to produce crops and
10
local measures for protecting the fish stocks around Costa de Pájaros. A
particularly interesting insight was the production of upcycled plastic products
made from locally collected waste in the environment as a business model. It
was also evident that, despite local efforts to build an attractive social and
environmental community context locally to facilitate sustainable tourism with
low environmental impact, external funds, and technical support (e.g., from
the state and/or universities) are needed to further develop and promote the
local projects properly. Moreover, the various organizations are not yet
networked well with each other and do not bundle their strengths and
knowledge, although there is potential for cooperation. An example includes
that the owners of a lodge could buy handcrafts from an association to
decorate their rooms or the restaurant area and, in return, allow the vendor a
space to sell the handcrafts to the tourists in the lodge. Mutually beneficial
synergies between the business models could thus be created.
The other group visited the two communities of Pozo de Agua and Matambú.
Pozo de Agua is a small village near the Gulf of Nicoya that is greatly impacted
by the Rio Tempisque flowing nearby. Its tidal shifts overflows large portions
of the surrounding areas, turning them into swamps for long periods of the
year. Naturally, this attracts many species of endemic birds, reptiles,
amphibians, and plants as well as migrating birds. However, because of
economic interests, investors seek to use these wetlands for their own benefit
by cultivating crops and cattle.
The main tourist attraction of Pozo de Agua is a small island in the swamps,
called El Tieso, with a rustic restaurant run by locals. The staff is part of an
association of more than sixty women from local communities in Guanacaste,
who promote and sell corn-related products often produced using ancestral
techniques. The products can range from corn seeds or corn flours to cultural
experiences like El Tieso. On ‘El Tieso’, they mainly serve traditional dishes,
such as locally caught fish and many variations of corn-based food and drinks.
As the village is in a very remote area, the people try to earn additional money
by accommodating tourists in private homes for a small fare. This has added
benefit in that it allows the community to distribute earnings among more
villagers (e.g., by selling locally produced food, drinks or handicrafts).
Moreover, the students visited a tourist facility in the indigenous territory of
Matambú. Under their tourism brand ‘Namu Nekupe’, three members of the
11
Chorotega tribe offer insight into the traditional lifestyle of their ancestors by
showing and explaining musical instruments, games, food and drinks, their
traditional homes, and traditional handicrafts like pottery. The interviews with
local entrepreneurs and community members show, yet again, the particular
problem of low tourist numbers to sustain the low impact local tourism. The
reasons are locally seen in the lack of infrastructure, which includes missing
internet, bad access to public transport, and in the case of El Tiesothe lack of
clean water and electricity on the island. Moreover, in Pozo de Agua there are
additional aspects complicating attracting tourists, such as the reliance of
tourists on private residences for accommodation. Another specific challenge,
according to the local informants, relates to insufficient education and
knowledge in both communities. Operating tourism business requires a certain
media know-how to promote the business online on social media platforms,
as well as basic English language skills to communicate with foreigners.
Learning new business management techniques would almost certainly help
ensure a secure income for a community that does not exclusively rely on
domestic tourists. The lack of identity within the community, especially among
the youth, was reported to be another problem for tourism. This is further
aggravated by a scarcity of governmental support for indigenous culture,
resulting in youth migration movements towards the cities, which offer better
professional perspectives. Furthermore, the lack of governmental and
institutional support hinders indigenous communities such as the one in
Matambú to further improve their businesses. As a means of promotion, local
entrepreneurs had asked tourism centres and hotels to recommend their
facility to tourists, since they struggle with media presence and, as of now,
mainly rely on word-of-mouth support. In almost all cases, their requests were
denied.
Local concerns also relate to environmental integrity. Land grabbing and
unsustainable land use in the area were highlighted in the interviews. For
instance, neighbouring real estate construction by investors lead to substantial
ecological problems, which include extreme sedimentation and erosion along
rivers, higher nutrient input into the water and soil resulting in algae blooms,
and a reduction in water availability. Such damage to the local ecosystem
results in significant disadvantages for nature-based tourism activities. If the
tourists’ expectations cannot be met, local entrepreneurs involved in nature-
based tourism will not be able to sustain their businesses.
12
This summer school not only provided students with valuable theoretical and
practical insights, but also resulted in sharing expertise in research methods
and teaching practices among senior researchers of UOS and UTN. Junior as
well as senior researchers from both partners functioned as organizers,
lecturers and supervisors of the student research projects. In that way,
tangible knowledge was generated and exchanged among researchers,
students and non-scientific local actors.
Outlook
Trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and economic well-being are
frequently encountered in Costa Rica. A stronger emphasis on economic
development compared with the protection of biodiversity can, for instance,
be observed along the national pineapple production. Whereas large parts of
the agricultural sector were based on subsistence farming until the 1980s,
Costa Rica is now one of the leading pineapple exporters and, at the same
time, reportedly the world leader in pesticide usage per unit of food produced
(Morataya Montenegro and Batista Solís, 2020, 94). Nevertheless, the
pineapple production is promoted as ecologically sustainable to consumers
(Del Monte 2021, Kifa and Andraka, n.d.) and promises the Costa Rican
population sustainable economic growth through the use of technology. This
narrative, however, downplays the destructive side effects of pineapple
production (León Araya, 2021,122). The fact that an agricultural production
method that contaminates entire areas and displaces traditional production
methods is labelled as “sustainable” warrants an examination of the
underlying sustainability concept. Recent research has shown that the strong
economic orientation of the prevailing sustainability paradigm can provide
explanatory approaches here (Gutiérrez Arguedas and Granados Chaverri,
2020, Herrera Rodríguez, 2013, Isla, 2015, León Araya, 2022, Monge
Hernández, 2015, Ramírez Cover, 2020). The strong role economic well-being
plays within the sustainable development paradigm, and its primary definition
as economic growth, has been criticized early on (Escobar, 1995, Sachs, 1991,
Sachs, 2000, Schmieder, 2010) and is at the centre of current debates on the
dominant sustainability concept in Costa Rica and elsewhere (Bendell, 2022,
Mariño Jiménez et al., 2018, Rivera Hernández, 2017, Santamarina et al.,
2015, Wanner, 2015). This neoliberal approach segregates spaces of socio-
ecological unity into the designated “pristine areas” for promoting ecotourism
on the one hand, and economic areas fostering economic growth on the other.
13
Such an approach encompasses contradictory practices and ignores the
interplay between sectors.
The results of our analysis of Costa Rican pineapple production in the context
of the Sustainable Development agenda will be compiled in a special issue
published in Revista Arjé in 2024. The articles include various perspectives
from the fields of social, environmental, cultural, and literary sciences. The
results illustrate contradictions in the country’s sustainability reputation,
highlight negative environmental consequences along various dimensions of
the national pineapple production and explore promising pathways to better
balance economic growth with biodiversity conservation.
References
Alms, V. y Wolff, M. (2019). The Gulf of Nicoya (Costa Rica) Fisheries System:
Two Decades of Change. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics,
Management, and Ecosystem Science, 11, 139–161
Bendell, J. (2022). Replacing Sustainable Development: Potential Frameworks
for International Cooperation in an Era of Increasing Crises and Disasters.
Sustainability, 14 (13), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138185.
Calvo, I. (2018). Los conflictos socio ambientales por el uso, manejo y
apropiación de los recursos naturales en el Área Marina de Pesca Responsable
Paquera Tambor. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).
Sede académica Costa Rica.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBC) (2000). Sustaining
life on Earth - How the Convention on Biological Diversity promotes nature
and human well-being. https://www.cbd.int/convention/guide/?id=web
Del Monte (2021). A brighter World tomorrow, 2021 Sustainability Report.
https://freshdelmonte.com/wp-
content/uploads/2022/10/FDM_2021_SustainabilityReportFINAL.pdf
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. The making and unmaking of
the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14
Estado de la Nación (2019). La Piña en Costa Rica: ubicando conflictos
ambientales en Áreas Silvestres Protegidas y Ecosistemas de Humedad.
Programa Estado de la Nación. Consejo Nacional de Rectores.
https://estadonacion.or.cr/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Gonzalez-V.-2019.-
Piña.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2019). Main
results and metadata by country (2006-2015). World Programme for the
Census of Agriculture 2010. FAO Statistical Development Series No. 17. Rome.
Franz, M., Schlitz, N. y Schumacher, K. P. (2018). Globalization and the water-
energy-food nexus–Using the global production networks approach to analyze
society-environment relations. Environmental Science & Policy, 90, 201-212.
Gorris, P. (2019). Mind the gap between aspiration and practice in co-
managing marine protected areas: A case study from Negros Occidental,
Philippines. Marine Policy, 105, 12-19.
Gutiérrez Arguedas, Alberto y Granados Chaverri, Carlos (2020).
Nacionalismo, Frontera y Excepcionalismo Verde en Costa Rica. Anuario de
Estudios Centroamericanos (46), 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.15517/AECA.V46I0.43807.
Halbe, J. y Adamowski, J. (2019). Modeling sustainability visions: A case study
of multi-scale food systems in Southwestern Ontario. Journal of Environmental
Management, 231, 1028-1047.
Heimann, D. (2018). Unternehmensnetzwerke für nachhaltige
Gewerbegebiete - Gezielte Förderung durch Netzwerkanalysen. Standort, 42,
223228.
Herrera Rodríguez, M. (2013). Sustainable Development in Costa Rica: A
Geographic Critique. Journal of Latin American Geography 12 (2), 193–219.
Herrera Ulloa, A., Villalobos Chacón, L., Palacios Villegas, J., Viquez Portuguéz,
R. y Oro Marcos, G. (2011). Coastal fisheries of Costa Rica. S. Salas, R.
Chuenpagdee, A. Charles, J.C. Seijo (Eds). Coastal fisheries of Latin America
15
and the Caribbean. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 544.
Rome: FAO.
Ingram, M., Ingram, H. y Lejano, R. (2019). Environmental action in the
Anthropocene: The power of narrative-networks. Journal of Environmental
Policy & Planning, 21(5), 492-503.
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
Services (IPBES) (2019): Global assessment report on biodiversity and
ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, H. T.
Ngo (Eds). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
Isla, A. (2015). Greening Costa Rica: The Political Ecology of Sustainable
Development. In: Richard C. Mitchell, Shannon A. Moore (Eds.). Planetary
Praxis & Pedagogy. Transdisciplinary Approaches to Environmental
Sustainability. Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei, Sense Publishers, 73-94.
Kifah, S. y Andraka, S. (n.d.). Costa Rica: Sustainable Pineapple.
Kluger, L., Gorris, P., Kochalski, S., Müller, M. & Romagnoni, G. (2020).
Studying human-nature relationships through a network lens: A systematic
review. People and Nature, 2,1100-1116.
Láscarez, D. (2012). Pescadores artesanales del Golfo de Nicoya: La
disminución del recurso pesquero y la alteración socio ambiental como
producto de la subsunción ideal del trabajo artesanal al capital. Universidad
Nacional de Costa Rica.
León-Araya, A. (2021). Agrarian extractivism and sustainable development.
The politics of pineapple expansion in Costa Rica. Ben M. McKay/Alberto
Alonso-Fradejas/Arturo Ezquerro-Cañete (Eds.). Agrarian Extractivism in Latin
America (pp. 99-116). Calgary, Canada/Buenos Aires, University of Calgary.
Mariño Jiménez, J.P., Flores Gamboa, S. y Bonilla, J. (2018). Sostenibilidad
versus Sustentabilidad. Una propuesta integradora que desvirtúa su uso
homólogo. Opción 34 (87), 1391–1422.
16
Monge Hernández, C. (2015). Desarrollo sostenible a la tica: geopolítica y
ambiente en la Administración Figueres Olsen (1994-1998). Rev. Rupturas 5
(1), 1–21.
Morataya Montenegro, R. y Bautista Solís, P. (2020). Water Governance and
Adaptation to Drought in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Edson de Oliveira Vieira,
Samuel Sandoval-Solis, Valmir de Albuquerque Pedrosa et al. (Eds.).
Integrated Water Resource Management (pp. 85-100). Cham, Springer
International Publishing.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water Governance in the face of global change: From
understanding to transformation. Springer International Publishing
Switzerland.
Palacios J.A. y Villalobos L. (2007). La historia de la pesca en el Golfo de
Nicoya, Costa Rica (1950–2005). Universidad Nacional, Escuela de Ciencias
Biológicas.
Ramírez Cover, A. (2020). Excepcionalismo verde y desarrollo sostenible en
Costa Rica. Anuario del Centro de Investigación y Estudios Políticos (11), 1
21.
Riechmann, J. (1995). Desarrollo Sostenible: la lucha por la interpretación.
In: Jorge Riechmann/JoManuel Naredo/Antonio Estevan/Roberto Bermejo
(Eds). De la Economía a la Ecología. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Rivera Hernández, J.E., Blanco Orozco, N.V., Alcántara Salinas, G., Houbron,
E.P. y Pérez Sato, J.A. (2017). ¿Desarrollo sostenible o sustentable? La
controversia de un concepto. Posgrado y Sociedad. Revista Electrónica del
Sistema de Estudios de Posgrado 15 (1), 57–67.
https://doi.org/10.22458/rpys.v15i1.1825.
Sachs, W. (1991). Environment and development: the story of a dangerous
liaison. Ecologist, 21(6), 252-252.
Sachs, W. (2000). ‘Development. The rise and decline of an ideal’. Wuppertal
Papers 108. Recuperado el 12 septiembre de 2023 de
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49106/1/332536696.pdf
17
Santamarina, B., Vaccaro, I. y Beltran, O. (2015). The Sterilization of Eco-
Criticism: From Sustainable Development to Green Capitalism. Anduli (14),
13-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2015.i14.01.
Schilling-Vacaflor, A., & Vollrath, D. (2012). Indigenous and peasant
participation in resource governance in Bolivia and Peru. In: Barry Canno/
Peadar Kirby (Eds). Civil society and the state in leftled Latin America:
Challenges and limitations to democratization, 126-140.
Schlünder, S. (2018). Las Humanidades Ambientales como desafío y
oportunidad de la Hispanística. Narrativas del medioambiente en Anacristina
Rossi. Bolte, R.; Haase, J. & S. Schlünder (Eds.). La Hispanística y los desafíos
de la globalización en el siglo XXI. Posiciones, negociaciones y códigos en las
redes transatlánticas (pp. 291-305). Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.
Schmieder, F. (2010). Die Krise der Nachhaltigkeit. Zur Kritik der politischen
Ökologie. Berlin: Peter Lang.
United Nations (UN) (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. Recuperado
el 21 mayo de 2020 de https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
United Nations (UN) (2020). World Investment Report 2020 - International
Production Beyond the Pandemic. Recuperado el 1 junio de 2020 de
https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2020_en.pdf
Wanner, T. (2015). The New ‘Passive Revolution’ of the Green Economy and
Growth Discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of Neoliberal
Capitalism. New Political Economy 20 (1), 21–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.866081.