64
Yulök Revista de Innovación Académica, ISSN 2215-5147, Vol. 8, N.º 1
Enero-Junio 2024, pp. 62-68
Boy, J. The Impact of Viewing Women as Predominantly Peacebuilders.
peace negotiations. primarily ¨men¨, who risk their lives
in battle to protect their territories and fight structural
injustices that exist in their communities. Since women
have monopolized peace building, they have bolstered
the notion that they are, in fact, the protectors (anti-mi-
litarists), and have remained marginalized in militaristic
agendas like peace talks.
Additionally, for most warring factions, as James A.
Schear noted In a Stanford University news release Why
peace agreements often fail to end civil wars,
¨ Sometimes war is safer than peace unless you are on the
losing end. It generates profit and even provides employ-
ment. Peace on the other hand is a leap into the unknown;
it is full of promises that can come undone¨
Based on James Shear´s theory, skilled negotiators are
skilled warmakers who can persuade opposing sides that
a peaceful resolution would be in their best interests. Sin-
ce women are considered to be largely engaged in peace
building, they are assumed to lack the required skillset in
this field and are excluded.
On the other hand, while ideas of leadership have been
mostly associated with being feared,¨a warrior¨. As sug-
gested by (Amy J.C 2013a)in the Harvard Business Re-
view, there has been a major shift of ideas and increased
acknowledgment of the fact that leadership requires ex-
ceptional social skills rather than physical strength (Yu-
val, 2012). This implies that women possess an advantage
over males as they are known for their impeccable ability
to mobilize and create networks. However, the institutio-
nalization of peace has encouraged constant socialization
of women to be peaceful and adhere to nonviolence ergo
exclusion in politics. Precisely, a good leader should be
merciful, peaceful, generous, and tolerant but should also
possess a ―criminal virtue necessary for the security of
that state (Machiavelli, 1513). According to Machiavelli
the criminal virtue must be carried out when it is absolu-
tely necessary for the state and should not be frequent lest
callous cruelty grows. In this respect, women capitalizing
on their diversity, possess all the requirements for leader-
ship. Nevertheless, a monolithic approach to their roles as
predominantly peacemakers limit their prospects.
Similarly, the socialization of women into being peaceful
has led to women distancing themselves from the mili-
tary. Degroot et al. (2000) contend that while feminists
have persistently pressed governments and military ins-
titutions to allow women to serve in combat, very few
women aspire to work in this area. Although it is possible
to refute this claim by arguing that an increasing num-
ber of women are enlisting in the army, Creveld (2000)
notes that an increasing number of women are doing so,
because the enemy has vanished. Women therefore en-
list with the hope of never engaging in combat. Baaz and
Stern (2011) supporting Creveld’s (2000) findings note
that many modern armies have switched from fighting to
peacekeeping and humanitarian missions, they conclude
that the foregoing has brought attention to the necessity
of women in peacekeeping as women are perceived to
be morally responsible individuals who can imbue their
feminine traits to men within their proximity (Baaz and
Stern, 2011:572).
(Cossa, S & Palik. J,2023) also observe that a singular
emphasis on women as peacebuilders has permeated the
field of policy where women have been left out of the
benefits of Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegra-
tion (DDR) programs. (Cossa, S & Palik. J,2023). DDR
is an extremely challenging process, especially as ever-
yone becomes a target after violence and should be trea-
ted as such throughout subsequent peace building efforts.
The process has become simpler and less expensive,
though, as women are now recognized as peacemakers.
In other words, men have been singled out for DDR’s at-
tention and have reaped its rewards by sticking to their
positions as peacemakers. As a result, a significant
proportion of female veterans continue to be extremely
vulnerable to using violence. While it is true that there
aren’t many female ex-combatants in comparison to men,
it is important to remember that young girls and women
who were kidnapped and forced to become the wives of
ex-combatants are also vulnerable to violence. Moreo-
ver, de Watteville (2002:1) observes that despite rare in
number, female ex-combatants are often more susceptible
than male ex-combatants.
The Impact on War
High degree of complexity of intrastate conflicts at the
end of the Cold War blurred the battlefield lines as wars
moved into towns and villages (Kaldor,M 2013:1). Con-
sequently, there were innumerable amounts of civilian ca-
sualties predominantly women and children (Cooke and
Woollacott,2014, p.1). These ideas gave rise to the Myth
of Protection. (Tickner A, 2004) argues that the myth of
protection rests on the concept that wars are fought to pri-
marily protect women, children, and the extremely vul-
nerable. This myth has blinded us to the participation of
men as victims of violent conflict. In much more precise
terms, since men do not fall in the ¨vulnerable¨ category,
men in general—even those without weapons—have
always been viewed as fighters. (Elshtain, 1998:455).
The failure to recognize men as victims of violent conflict
potentially endangers the lives of many as it has made
them acceptable targets for warfare (Jones, 2009). Accor-