La gestión del conocimiento para la innovación y el desarrollo rural: experiencias desde Costa Rica

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Luis Miguel Barboza Arias
Fernando Sáenz Segura

Resumo

El objetivo del artículo es revisar la evolución conceptual de la gestión del conocimiento, para luego analizar su operacionalización en dos experiencias de extensión en Costa Rica. Se utilizan los estudios de caso como herramienta metodológica y el enfoque de los sistemas de innovación agropecuaria como lente analítico. Se plantea que la gestión del conocimiento rural es un fenómeno relativamente nuevo en Costa Rica. No obstante, las iniciativas presentadas buscan un cambio de paradigma que mejore el abordaje de las problemáticas rurales más complejas. Se concluye con algunas limitaciones del estudio y elementos para avanzar en la construcción de una agenda de investigación en el tema. 

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
La gestión del conocimiento para la innovación y el desarrollo rural:: experiencias desde Costa Rica. (2020). Yulök Revista De Innovación Académica, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47633/yulk.v4i1.199
Seção
Artículo científico

Como Citar

La gestión del conocimiento para la innovación y el desarrollo rural:: experiencias desde Costa Rica. (2020). Yulök Revista De Innovación Académica, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47633/yulk.v4i1.199

Referências

Aguilar-Gallegos, N., Muñoz-Rodríguez, M., Santoyo-Cortés, H., Aguilar-Ávila, J., Klerkx, L. (2015). Information networks that generate economic value: A study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico. Agricultural Systems, 135, pp. 122-132.

Arkesteijn, M., van Mierlo, B., Leeuwis, C. (2015). The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation. Evaluation, 21 (1), pp. 99-115.

Bennett, E. M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B. N., & Lebel, L. (2015). Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Environmental Sustainability, 14, pp. 76-85.

Darnhofer, I., Schermer, M. W. Schneeberger (2008) Editorial: Continuity and change in organic farming – Philosophy, policy and practice. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7, pp. 1‐4.

Dentoni, D., Klerkx, L. (2015). Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes. Marine Policy, 60, pp. 259-271.

Dogliotti, S., García, M. C., Peluffo, S., Dieste, J. P., Pedemonte, A. J., Bacigalupe, G., Rossing, W. A. H. (2014). Co-innovation of family farm systems: A systems approach to sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 126, pp. 76-86.

Duckett, T., Pearson, S., Blackmore, S., Grieve, B. (2018). Agricultural Robotics: The Future of Robotic Agriculture. UK-RAS White papers.

Engel, P., 1995. Facilitating innovation: an action-oriented approach and participatory methodology to improve innovative social practice in agriculture. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Fabricius, C., Cundill, G. (2014). Learning in adaptive management: insights from published practice. Ecology and Society, 19 (1).

FAO y Banco Mundial (2000). Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems for Rural Development: Strategic Vision and Guiding Principles. Washington, DC: FAO.

Frisk, E., Larson, K. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2(1), pp. 1-20.

Gerlak, A., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., Armitage, D. (2018). Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: a review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51 (3), pp. 335-371.

Godin B., Vinck D., 2017. Critical Studies of Innovation. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hermans, F., Klerkx, L., Roep, D. (2015). Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21 (1), pp. 35-54.

INEC (2019). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares. San José, Costa Rica: INED.

Ingram, J., (2008). Agronomist-farmer knowledge encounters: an analysis of knowledge exchange in the context of best management practices in England, Agriculture and Human Values, 25, pp. 405–418.

Kilelu, C., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural systems, 118, pp. 65-77.

Klerkx, L., Jansen, J. (2010). Building knowledge systems for sustainable agriculture: supporting private advisors to adequately address sustainable farm management in regular service contacts. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8 (3), pp. 148-163.

Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C. (2008). Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation, 28 (6), pp. 364-378.

Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., Kilelu, C. (2012). Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: towards innovation system facilitation. ids Bulletin, 43 (5), pp. 53-60.

Klerkx, L., Van Mierlo, B., Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions. Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic, pp. 457-483.

Leeuwis, C. (2004). Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Meléndez, J., Parker, B. (2018). Learning in participatory planning processes: Taking advantage of concepts and theories across disciplines. Planning Theory & Practice, pp. 1-8.

Nagel, U. (1980) Institutionalisation of knowledge flows: an analysis of the extension role of two agricultural universities in India. Special issue of the Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 30, DLG Verlag, Frankfurt.

Petit S. (2015). Faut-il absolument innover? À la recherche d’une agriculture d’avant-garde. Courrier de l’environnement de l’Inra, 65, pp.19-28.

Röling, N. (1989) The Agricultural Research-technology Transfer Interface: A Knowledge Systems Perspective. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).

Röling, N. (1992) The emergence of knowledge systems thinking: A changing perception of relationships among innovation, knowledge process and configuration. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 5, pp. 42–64.

Röling, N., Wagemakers, M. (Eds) (1998) Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerkx, L., van Ast, A., Bastiaans, L. (2014). Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review. Crop Protection, 56, pp. 98-108.

Schmid, J., Knierim, A., Knuth, U. (2016). Policy-induced innovations networks on climate change adaptation–An ex-post analysis of collaboration success and its influencing factors. Environmental Science & Policy, 56, pp. 67-79.

SEPSA (2011). Política de estado para el sector agroalimentario y el desarrollo rural costarricense 2010-2021. San José, C.R.: MAG.

SEPSA (2014). Políticas para el sector agropecuario y el desarrollo de los territorios rurales 2015-2018. San José, C.R.: MAG.

SEPSA (2018). Lineamientos de política 2019-2022 para el Sector Agropecuario, Pesquero y Rural. Costa Rica: MAG.

Siebenhüner, B., Rodela, R., Ecker, F. (2016). Social learning research in ecological economics: A survey. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, pp. 116-126.

Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., des Ios Rios, I., Ashkenazy, A. (2018). Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, pp. 232-241.

Suškevičs, M., Hahn, T., Rodela, R., Macura, B., Pahl-Wostl, C. (2018). Learning for social-ecological change: a qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal of environmental planning and management, 61 (7), 1085-1112.

Temple, L., Sawadogo, E. (Eds.). (2018). Innovation processes in agro-ecological transitions in developing countries. John Wiley & Sons.

Therond, O., Duru, M., Roger-Estrade, J., Richard, G. (2017). A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37 (3), pp. 21.

Turner, J., Klerkx, L., White, T., Nelson, T., Everett-Hincks, J., Mackay, A., Botha, N. (2017). Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: How projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation. Land Use Policy, 68, pp. 503-523.

Touzard, J. (2018). Agricultural and agrifood innovation in the 21st century: maintaining, erasing or reshaping its specificities? In Faure et a., (Ed.). Innovation and development in agricultural and food systems. France: Éditions Quæ, pp. 37-52.

Van Woerkum, C. (1990a) Het instrumentele nut van voorlichting in beleidsprocessen. Massacommunicatie, 18, pp. 263–78.

Wigboldus, S., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., Schut, M., Muilerman, S., Jochemsen, H. (2016). Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36 (3).

World Bank, 2012. Agricultural Innovation Systems – An Innovation Source Book. World Bank, Washington DC.

Yang, H., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C. (2014). Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China. Agricultural Systems, 127, pp. 115-125.

Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied social research Methods Series. Newbury Park, California: Sage

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >>