University Ethics as a Social Practice: Symbolic Disputes and Public Responsibility at the Universidad Técnica Nacional

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47633/n3jg4y16

Keywords:

Ethics, Organizational culture, Power relations, Social responsibility, Public Universities

Abstract

University ethics at the National Technical University (UTN) is conceived as an essential pillar to ensure institutional integrity and public responsibility. Beyond regulatory compliance, ethics is understood as a social, cultural, and historical practice that guides staff decisions within a context marked by power relations, organizational tensions, and symbolic disputes. The Code of Ethics, approved in 2015, seeks to regulate professional behavior and strengthen internal cohesion by promoting values such as justice, equity, and transparency. However, its predominantly legal approach is insufficient to address contemporary challenges: structural inequalities, technological acceleration, virtualization, internationalization, and the use of artificial intelligence. These changes demand a substantial update of the Code, oriented toward a more relational, dialogical, and contextualized ethics capable of addressing emerging phenomena and ensuring academic integrity. UTN, as a humanistic institution, must conceive ethics not only as a regulatory mechanism but also as a formative resource that fosters critical awareness and collective responsibility. In this sense, university ethics becomes a key axis of organizational culture, legitimizing public decisions and strengthening social trust. Updating the Code is not an administrative procedure but an essential condition for the university to respond thoughtfully and responsibly to the challenges of a dynamic, diverse, and deeply unequal world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araos San Martín, J. (2003). La ética de Aristóteles y su relación con la ciencia y la Técnica. http://www.umce.cl/~dialogos/n06_2003/araos.swf

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2007). El sentido práctico. Siglo XXI Editores.

Guerrero Peña, L., & Useche, M. (julio-setiembre, 2007). El principio de responsabilidad. Episteme. 3(10). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342656646_El_principio_de_responsabilidad

Jonas, H. (1995). El principio de la responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Editorial Herder

Méndez Medrano, C., Torres Gangotena, M., & Camatón Arizabal, S. (abril, 2018). Importancia de la ética en la Educación Superior. Revista Científica: Dominio de las Ciencias, 4(2). 215–223. https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v4i2.802

Salvador Martínez, M., & García Cuevas, R. (2025). Ética política e instituciones públicas. Dykinson. https://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/180022

Universidad Técnica Nacional. (2015). Código de deberes éticos y profesionales de los funcionarios de la Universidad Técnica Nacional. https://www.utn.ac.cr/sites/default/files/attachments/C%C3%B3digo%20de%20Deberes%20%C3%89ticos%20y%20Profesionales%20de%20los%20Funcionarios%20de%20la%20Universidad%20T%C3%A9cnica%20Nacional.pdf

Universidad Técnica Nacional. (2016). Modelo Educativo de la Universidad Técnica Nacional. https://www.utn.ac.cr/content/modelo-educativo

Universidad Técnica Nacional. (2025). Marco Estratégico. https://www.utn.ac.cr/index.php/content/marco-estrat%C3%A9gico

Universidad Técnica Nacional. (Circa 2022). Plan Institucional de Desarrollo Estratégico 2022-2026. https://www.utn.ac.cr/sites/default/files/attachments/Plan%20Institucional%20de%20Desarrollo%202022-2026.pdf

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Madrigal Corrales, L. (2025). University Ethics as a Social Practice: Symbolic Disputes and Public Responsibility at the Universidad Técnica Nacional. Academic Journal Arjé , 8(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.47633/n3jg4y16

Similar Articles

1-10 of 90

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.